Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility跨国公司与公司社会责任：国际法的局限性与机会 pdf pdb 阿里云 极速 mobi caj kindle 下载

The 'corporate social responsibility' ('CSR') movement has been described as one of the most important social movements of our time. This book looks at what the CSR movement means for multinationals, for states and for international law. International law is often criticized for being too 'state-centred', and ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of globalization. However, drawing from many and varied examples of state, NGO and corporate practice, this book argues that, while international law has its limitations, it presents more opportunities for the CSR regulation of multinationals than many people assume. The main obstacles to better regulation are, therefore, not legal, but political.

Preface

Table of treaties, declarations and other international instruments

Table of cases

Table of statutes and statutory instruments

List of abbreviations

Introduction

Part Ⅰ Regulatory issues and problems

1 Multinationals and corporate social responsibility: a new regulatory agenda

Why are people so concerned about multinationals?

The rise of the CSR movement

Defining 'corporate social responsibility'

Regulation in a deregulatory era

Corporate social responsibility and human rights

Designing regulatory responses: some persistent problems

Conclusion

2 Multinationals under international law

What is international law?

Who makes international law?

The concept of international legal personality

Multinationals and human rights

　　The role ot non-state actors

　　Conclusion

　3　Multinationals under national law: the problem of jurisdiction

　　The limits of jurisdiction under public international law

　　The limits of jurisdiction under private international law

　　Extraterritorial CSR regulation of multinationals: time for a rethink?

　　An alternative definition of 'extraterritoriality'

　　Conclusion

Part Ⅱ Home state regulation of multinationals

　4　New directions in extraterritorial regulation of CSR standards

　　 Defining the 'home state'

　　 Why do 'home states' have an interest in the foreign CSR standards of multinationals?

　　 Extraterritorial regulatory techniques: recent state practice

　　 Home state CSR initiatives under international law

　　 Conclusion

　5　Private claims for personal injury and environmental harm

　　 Tort-based claims

　　 The US Alien Tort Claims Act ('ATCA')

　　 Theories of parent company liability

　　 Parent company liability and the relevance of the organisational form

　　 Implications for international law

　　 Conclusion

Part Ⅲ　International regulation of multinationals

6 Towards an international law of CSR?

　　 International CSR standards for multinationals: a brief history

7 Multinationals and CSR: limitations and opportunities in international law

Bibliography

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility跨国公司与公司社会责任：国际法的局限性与机会在线阅读

在线听书地址：Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility跨国公司与公司社会责任：国际法的局限性与机会在线收听

在线购买地址：Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility跨国公司与公司社会责任：国际法的局限性与机会在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

作者简介：Formerly an energy law specialist with a major London firm, Dr Zerk now works as an independent researcher and consultant, advising on the legal and regulatory aspects of 'corporate social responsibility'.

书籍介绍

The 'corporate social responsibility' ('CSR') movement has been described as one of the most important social movements of our time. This book looks at what the CSR movement means for multinationals, for states and for international law. International law is often criticized for being too 'state-centred', and ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of globalization. However, drawing from many and varied examples of state, NGO and corporate practice, this 2006 book argues that, while international law has its limitations, it presents more opportunities for the CSR regulation of multinationals than many people assume. The main obstacles to better regulation are, therefore, not legal, but political.